I have been especially blessed by those who have not taken a public part in the discussions here in Blog Town, but who have approached me to express their appreciation for how I have written here and how I have disagreed. That encouragement was not expected, and it has been wonderful.
I don’t know what the next two days will hold. I was told today that registration is only very slightly ahead of last year’s pace. If this is true, then the theory behind the illustration in my post titled The Old Guard may yet prove true. But my experience with those who haven’t been participants may show that, while Blog Town may have relatively few residents, it may have a relatively large influence. Time will tell.
[UPDATE]
Not long after this blogger-filled day started, I had a conversation with IMB trustee and fellow Oklahoma pastor Winston Curtis of Highland Park Baptist Church in Duncan. I also had the privelege of meeting his lovely wife.
Pastor Curtis asked me if I would share a message on my blog to the young leaders of our convention, and his message was essentially this (I am quoting from memory, so it may not be word-for-word): “The conservative resurgence was for you. I love and appreciate your passion, commitment to God’s Word, and desire to see the SBC used of God to increase His Kingdom. My sword is drawn toward no one.”
I had talked with Pastor Curtis on the phone, and had met him previously in Albuquerque. While he has disagreed with many in the blog world, I find him to be sincere, genuine, and quite likeable. I enjoyed seeing him again today, and appreciate his desire to communicate with all of us, though he admits to a lack of technical savvy that prevents him from being an active blogger. He did promise that his wife would be reading, however.
[/UPDATE]
[UPDATE]
It seems that section 105 is the center of the usefulness of the “promo” network. I tried it from a couple of different spots in the arena, and only Mr. $89 shows up as available. So I guess that’s where I’ll sit from now on…
[/UPDATE]
It really is frightening to think about all the blogging that will be happening in this big room this week. I, for one, am looking forward to it.
I intend with this post to introduce a new word into the English language. Someone alert Merriam-Webster.
Watch for a major adjustment, possibly within the next day or two.
Oh, yeah, I’ve made it into North Carolina (motto: Esse quam videri). In the spirit of Blogtown contests, the first person who is in Greensboro and tells me in person what that Latin motto means in English gets lunch on me. I’m looking forward to sitting under the preaching tomorrow morning of the Rev. Kevin Bussey, then cruising up to Greensboro, checking into my hotel, and hearing some great preaching tomorrow night.
More than anything, I look forward to meeting those of you who I have gotten to know in an electronic sort of way in recent months. If you’re in that group (and you know who you are), please email me a cell phone number or some other way we can make contact. I’d like to be able to put a face with a name, and to sneak a photo of Art with my camera phone.
See you there…
How will the residents of Blog Town recognize each other in Greensboro?
For some, it will be easy. For example, if you see a guy witnessing in Starbucks, that’ll be Kevin. If you see a man berating someone for eating pork BBQ (abomination), that will be Art.
Some have pictures posted around, like Dorcas, Marty, or Wade.
But so many others remain a complete mystery. We could find ourselves riding in the same elevator with, say, a member of the Arkansas Razorbaptist(s) team, and not even know it. We might unknowingly pass Villa Rica crossing the street, although that might be difficult to do, as I suspect he’ll have his bulldogs with him…
We could use some identifying mark, like the “B” on my shirt in this (somewhat) recent photo. Of course, I’ll have the hat, but how will I know you?
This post is a special thanks to my friend CW (that’s him on the right, preaching at Lakewood) for designing my new banner and explaining to a slow learner like me how to get it in place. For an equally clever banner and some insightful writing that makes a great contribution to our SBC conversation, visit him at Philippians 3:10.
Thanks, CW! Say “hi” to Joel for me!
By now, if you’re still with me, you’re wondering what this has to do with anonymity; it is, in fact, the purpose of this post. I call on all those who want to participate in the many facets of our SBC debate to do so prayerfully, thoughtfully, and openly. There has been much damage to trust in our conversation caused by anonymous comments, and this should not be. There has been much-needed repentance, which I deeply appreciate. But there continue to be those who do not have the integrity to place their identity behind their words, and I see this as nothing more than a lack of faith in God’s sovereign care. Of course, I welcome the participation of those whose missionary service in parts of the world where the revelation of their identity would place themselves or their families in physical jeopardy, and I respect this as a legitimate reason for anonymity. But I am convinced that it is the only legitimate reason.
I was not a part of the conservative resurgence in our convention, although I am in agreement with the publicly stated goals of those who led it. I have no doubt that there are those whose actions toward others in the carrying out of our “reformation” leave them in need of repentance, though I myself am under no such personal conviction. I do not question the claims of ungodly treatment that some have made. I do not question the belief on the part of some that if their identity were placed with their statements, they would be targeted for retribution. What I question in those who choose to remain anonymous is their faith in the power of God to sustain them in the trial, or to deliver them from it.
If someone believes that they must say what they have to say, and they are convinced of the truth of their statement, they should be willing to place it before the world openly and allow God to do with it, and with them, whatever He wills.
Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah (better known as Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego) did not anonymously refuse to worship Nebuchadnezzar’s statue. They stood confidently before the enraged king and said, “If the God we serve exists, then He can rescue us from the furnace of blazing fire, and He can rescue us from the power of you, the king. But even if He does not rescue us, we want you as king to know that we will not serve your gods or worship the gold statue you set up.”
Each Monday, I receive by email the LifeWay newsletter Pastors Today. It contains sometimes useful information about issues affecting pastors.
Today’s edition contained a link to an article by Ken Gosnell titled How to Begin Your Own Pastors Blog. It gives some helpful advice for pastors contemplating making an entrance to the world of blogging, and that advice contained the following admonition:
Understand that bad writing or blogging will keep people away you’re your blog.
How true.
On an entirely different note, I do intend to share my reflections on the situation with IMB trustee Wade Burleson in light of my lunch meeting with him last week. There are a number of inconsistencies between what he shared with me and what I have received from other sources, and I am in the process of attempting to clarify some of these issues. I don’t want to publish conclusions based on incomplete information.
One of David Letterman’s silly occasional games used to be “Is This Anything?” He and Paul would look at an image and decide, between themselves, if it was anything or nothing.
I clicked over to Jerry Corbaley’s blog this morning to read the latest comments. The image in this post is his stat counter. It’s probably nothing, right? Anyone?
Recent Comments