The President of the Cooperative Program
Posted on Jun 26, 2006
in Cooperative Program, Frank Page, SBC President by Wes Kenney

When I first heard, from an opinion piece in the
Florida Baptist Witness, about the dismal
Cooperative Program giving of
First Baptist Church in Springdale under the leadership of
Dr. Ronnie Floyd, it made me curious. That curiosity led to research that eventually led to a
chart detailing that church's CP giving since 1986, the year Dr. Floyd became their pastor.
I then realized that, in order to be fair, I would need to publish such a chart for each announced SBC presidential candidate. Not wanting to be forced to rush the research, I prepared charts for every person I heard mentioned as a possibility. I think I did six or seven charts in all, and I was struck by a pattern I noticed in each of them.
Without exception, Cooperative Program giving had steadily declined in each of the charts I had done. In fact, if you look at the rate of decline in the CP giving of
FBC Taylors, South Carolina, where Dr. Frank Page is pastor, you will find that
their CP giving has declined under Dr. Page on a pace similar to that of FBC Springdale under Dr. Floyd.
In response to a question from
Jeff Richard Young, I dug a little deeper, and completed a chart for Dr. Page's previous church,
Warren Baptist Church in Augusta, Georgia. This chart, which I never published, detailed the CP giving of that church during Dr. Page's pastorate there. It showed CP giving in his first year, 1991, of 5.63%. That giving grew to 9.10% in 2001, his last year as their pastor.
I had an idea that I knew what this indicated, but to be sure, I emailed Dr. Page to ask him. Specifically, I asked if these numbers indicated a belief on his part that 10%, the number originally advocated by an ad hoc Cooperative Program study committee which reported to the convention this year, was the ideal for a church's CP participation.
Dr. Page responded, saying that he has said publicly that a church's CP giving should show "a selfless, missional mindset." He stated his belief that 10% does indeed reflect that mindset. He also said that, while it was true that his church's giving has been declining, he believes that trend will reverse when this year's numbers are published. He also pointed out in his email to me that, when he came to FBC Taylors, there was little to no mission activity emenating from that local church, and that they now have developed "one of the largest mission programs in the Southern Baptist convention from a local church," while at the same time giving "serious support to our denominational mission work."
Dr. Jerry Rankin, during the report of the
International Mission Board to the convention in Greensboro, made a statement that has stuck with me. I don't remember the exact quote, but the substance of the statement was that it is not the job of the IMB to take the gospel to the ends of the earth, but rather it is the job of the local church. Clearly, Dr. Page understands this mandate, and he is a fine example to follow in this regard.
I titled this post as I did because I believe that this is what Dr. Page's election was all about. In conversations with many who are not regular participants in the SBC blog conversations, I have found very little understanding about issues that have motivated many in this venue (IMB, NAMB, narrowing paramaters of cooperation, etc.). But I never had to explain the difference between .27% and 12.44%. Dr. Frank Page is our president, and his presidency is
of the Cooperative Program.
Jeff Richard Young Jun 26 2006 - 10:10 am
Dear Brother Wes,
I really think your charts were a great service to the messengers who had to choose among three candidates for President. You shined a light in a dark corner. It was fun to be a part of the process with you.
Love in Christ,
Jeff
Reply
Kevin Bussey Jun 26 2006 - 2:38 pm
Interesting observation Wes. You are probably right!
Reply
axegrinder Jun 26 2006 - 9:45 pm
hi,
i found you via purgatorio.
i was interested in looking at your site but find the blue and black theme very difficult to read.
Jason Kranzusch
Reply
The Mdude Jul 2 2006 - 8:22 pm
Wes
I think it would be interesting to look at CP giving, LMCO, and total missions giving or whatever terms they use. I think we may see a trend of CP giving reduction in favor of both giving for ‘baptist causes’ and individual missionaries outside the SBS. I met a guy a few years ago with Trans World Radio received 30% of his support from SB churches. Also some of these big SB churches send volunteers to IMB annual meetings overseas – I understand Dr Page’s church is sending volunteers to care for M families in an AGM. I would suppose that the amount of money spent for this would be put under the “giving for baptist causes” and justifiably so. Perhaps what we are seing in CP reduction conventionwide is a trend in younger congregations who do not relate to the SBC. Sounds like a MA thesis or dissertation here!
Reply